Critical analysis paper -Womens Philanthropy Board Fall Luncheon to Essay

deprecative analysis paper -Womens Philanthropy Board Fall Luncheon to kick off yearlong remembrance of 50 Years of Integration at Auburn University the speaker was Marybeth Gasman - Essay ExampleDemonstrating her power of speech, her surfeit had accurate facts her speech seemed salubrious organized with a clear entering and in force(p) conclusion the expression of delivery was perfect with high eloquence and clear voice as well as guardianship the audience entertained throughout. It all showed how well prepared she was (Darlington, para.3).The contents of Professor Gasmans speech concentrate on the theme of the event and sometimes beyond. She even touched on the need for students to recognize and advise efforts made by their respective colleges when they finish their education, expressing alarm over the decreasing number of people registering in alumni. To make her facts accurate, she shared statistics obtained from a recent study based on how African Americans give tush to their Universities they graduated from and how they give in general to the church tithes offering and the family members (para.43). This example, however, did not go down well with the African American students in the room and most of them saw this piece of information irrelevant to the military issue of the event (para.4).The speech was well organized and seemed to flow from the beginning to the end (para.17). Her introduction focused on huddles faced on the journey to academic excellence in various parts of the world. She made her introduction perfect by paying tribute to the students and staff who lost their lives in the deadly shooting at Connecticut elementary, which made her seize our attention (para.16). The introduction transited smoothly to her main speech of the day where she turn on the benefits of integration. She ended her speech by outlining a summary her main points thus making it a strong conclusion (para.46).The speech delivery was very convenient and thorough. She used an effective microphone with good sound quality that never jammed during her entire speech. The microphone made her voice loud fair to middling and we got every detail of her speech clearly